<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.clarkeology.com/m/4586/Didn%27t+get+an+aerial+fitted+then..."><dc:date></dc:date><dc:title>Didn't get an aerial fitted then...</dc:title><dc:description>Guy came, and can't fit an aerial. He was very helpful and has had a good look round, up in the loft and everything, but he says the only place we can get access to put an aerial might not give us a better picture than we're getting now, so it's not ... </dc:description></rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.clarkeology.com/m/4587/RE:+Didn%27t+get+an+aerial+fitted+then..."><dc:date></dc:date><dc:title>RE: Didn't get an aerial fitted then...</dc:title><dc:description>Be careful about&quot;higher numbers&quot; for HDTV - as you need to see if the figure is for a &quot;progressive&quot; or &quot;interlaced&quot; picture.  For example, 1080i (1920x1080 interlaced) isn't as good as 1080p (1920x1080 progressive) as it takes two scans in the former... </dc:description></rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.folkestonegerald.com/m/12677/Michael+Howard%27s+expenses"><dc:date></dc:date><dc:subject rdf:resource="http://www.folkestonegerald.com/folkestone" /><dc:subject rdf:resource="http://www.folkestonegerald.com/politics" /><dc:subject rdf:resource="http://www.folkestonegerald.com/michael_howard" /><dc:subject rdf:resource="http://www.folkestonegerald.com/expenses" /><dc:title>Michael Howard's expenses</dc:title><dc:description>So should we be angry about this sort of behaviour, or pleased that Mr Howard is spending money in the area (in Hythe rather than Folkestone, but still)? Have we been cheated more than we've benefitted? I can't work it out? Remember to vote tomorrow ... </dc:description></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
