<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.clarkeology.com/m/10842/Apple+Airbook"><dc:date></dc:date><dc:subject rdf:resource="http://www.folkestonegerald.com/weather" /><dc:subject rdf:resource="http://www.folkestonegerald.com/apple" /><dc:subject rdf:resource="http://www.folkestonegerald.com/mac" /><dc:subject rdf:resource="http://www.folkestonegerald.com/airbook" /><dc:subject rdf:resource="http://www.folkestonegerald.com/engadget" /><dc:subject rdf:resource="http://www.folkestonegerald.com/wired" /><dc:subject rdf:resource="http://www.folkestonegerald.com/thinksecret" /><dc:subject rdf:resource="http://www.folkestonegerald.com/macrumors" /><dc:title>Apple Airbook</dc:title><dc:description>There's a new ultra portable mac to be announced todday I think, some speculation here on Wired, see how everyone has to comment without reading the article? (Cue replies here, missing the point of this post, if there was a point, and there were any ... </dc:description></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
