<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.folkestonegerald.com/m/8150/Hmm%2C+you+could+also+try"><dc:date>2006-04-19UTC08:33:23</dc:date><dc:title>Hmm, you could also try</dc:title><dc:description>www.mrgig.com, they both seem to be mostly pub bands to me though. I would give whoever promotes the bands at Lanterns (that used to promote at Stripes), that seems to be more the style of music, and they don't seem to bother with the other local ban... </dc:description></rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.clarkeology.com/m/2500/Tears+before+bedtime"><dc:date>2004-12-17UTC10:51:42</dc:date><dc:title>Tears before bedtime</dc:title><dc:description>(I think nme.com already used &quot;Tears in Heaven&quot;)So, I went to see The Tears last night, at Heaven nightclub at Charing Cross... you know what? It wasn't all that. I love Suede, but never saw them live with Bernard Butler, so the opportunity to see hi... </dc:description></rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.clarkeology.com/m/7874/Folkestone%2C+you+have+embarrassed+yourself"><dc:date>2004-02-10UTC01:43:43</dc:date><dc:title>Folkestone, you have embarrassed yourself</dc:title><dc:description>Putting on a varied bill, is it a good thing or not? I was quite entertained by pop acts being thrown onto the Reading Bill, seeing Kevin Rowland in a neglige, was a particular treat. I've even seen the Manic Street Preachers, so I've seen some bad c... </dc:description></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>